| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-ppc-devel
Re: [XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN] The VIO rewrite
On Nov 5, 2006, at 11:18 PM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 10:02:41PM +0000, Xen patchbot-linux-
ppc-2.6 wrote:
# HG changeset patch
# User Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
# Node ID 2a9c6a23cd1292e9ed361e33d640ce84a6fbdb53
# Parent f4d382795e57b926cd82256bcb3a74c539731796
[XEN] The VIO rewrite
[snip]
I gave the newtwork tests a spin with this patch. After 4 hours I
stopped the tests.
I see a bunch of these warnings on the xen console.
---
(XEN) allocated RMA for Dom[13]: 0x18000000[0x4000000]
(XEN) Domain[13].0: initializing
(XEN) WARN at /home/tony/Xen/xenppc-unstable.hg.working/xen/include/
asm/mm.h:262
(XEN) [000000000000F8A0] 000000000040D8B4 .gmfn_to_mfn+0x70/0xa4
Ok, This happens because a foreign map might have been unmapped to
early, I saw this early on, but thought I nailed it. guess not.
On the bright side, asside from the fact the tests are taking a
long time, at
least some of them are succeeding.
---
Blade4:~/xm-test # egrep '(PASS|FAIL|SKIP)' network_vio.output
XFAIL: 02_network_local_ping_pos.test
PASS: 03_network_local_tcp_pos.test
PASS: 04_network_local_udp_pos.test
XPASS: 05_network_dom0_ping_pos.test
PASS: 06_network_dom0_tcp_pos.test
PASS: 07_network_dom0_udp_pos.test
XFAIL: 11_network_domU_ping_pos.test
FAIL: 12_network_domU_tcp_pos.test
FAIL: 13_network_domU_udp_pos.test
---
Is there a difference between "PASS" and "XPASS"?
I tried runnig quick and it took a long time, the system was
unresponsive.
much like:
http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=727
I really need to get to the bottom tod that one.
-JX
_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home