Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming

On Thu, 2006-07-06 at 23:19 +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > That's just because "x86_64" is the name they have have to contrast
> > with.
> 
> And even that only uses an underscore (instead of a dash) because
> autoconf would get confused otherwise.
> 
> > I don't see the point. It's our code, and nobody will get confused
> > looking for it anyways.
> 
> Quite so.  Seconded.
> 
> So what would concretely be the best naming in your opinion?

Please see the first mail in this thread:
xen/arch/ppc -> xen/arch/powerpc
xen/arch/ppc/ppc64 -> xen/arch/powerpc/powerpc64
xen/include/asm-ppc -> xen/include/asm-powerpc
xen/include/asm-ppc/ppc64 -> xen/include/asm-powerpc/powerpc64
config/ppc64.mk -> config/powerpc64.mk
xen/include/public/arch-ppc64.h -> xen/include/public/arch-powerpc.h

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Hollis Blanchard Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Jimi Xenidis Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Segher Boessenkool Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Jimi Xenidis Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Hollis Blanchard Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Segher Boessenkool Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Hollis Blanchard <=

Previous by Date:

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] revert to earlier get_register() error code, and comment it., Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable

Next by Date:

[XenPPC] directory renaming committed, Hollis Blanchard

Previous by Thread:

Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] directory renaming, Segher Boessenkool

Next by Thread:

[XenPPC] [xenppc-unstable] [ppc] gpproxy improvements, Xen patchbot-xenppc-unstable

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]