 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-ppc-devel
[XenPPC] [rfc] Serial discovery.
| To: | xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [XenPPC] [rfc] Serial discovery. |
| From: | Jimi Xenidis <jimix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 1 May 2006 11:23:57 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 01 May 2006 08:24:46 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Right now our serial device is assumed to be hanging off an ISA bus
(hardcoded address) at an offset (also hardcoded).
Neglecting the IOMMU, the only devices that we are interested is
console.
Right now we are restricting console to a UART, and have no plans to
support a framebuffer,ps/2,ADB,USB stuff tho it is possible (except
for USB :)).
Anyway, rather defining a bus+offset I think we should just keep an absolute address for the UART. thoughts? -JX _______________________________________________ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Next by Date: | Re: [XenPPC] [rfc] Serial discovery., Hollis Blanchard |
|---|---|
| Next by Thread: | Re: [XenPPC] [rfc] Serial discovery., Hollis Blanchard |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
