RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report

["Duan, Ronghui" <ronghui.duan@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Kouya,

Our QA member Amy reported few days before that Win2k3 hangs when booting. I 
find that if using Open Guest firmware and revert your patch of CS#17288, 
Win2k3 can boot. As Amy says Win2k3 can boot on Intel's firmware and I don't 
make sure that whether it is a firmware's bug but I note that you delete many 
conditions checking in your patch. I rewrite your patch base on original code 
and seem that Win2k3 can boot as normal. I am not sure whether it implements 
the purpose of your patch, could you help to check? 

I find that you include one condition that vpsr.it=0, vpsr.dt=1 which does not 
exist in original code. I am not sure whether this condition could happen in 
the real OS. If so could we support this at this time? If you can make sure 
that it is fine, could you explain that or whether I misunderstand something? 
Thanks.

Best regards
Ronghui

>-----Original Message-----
>From: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-ia64-devel-
>bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mu, Qin
>Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 4:59 PM
>To: Alex Williamson; Akio Takebe
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report
>
>Hi,
>
>This Windows guest boot failure only happens when open guest firmware is
>used. Intel guest firmware is OK.
>
>After simply investigating on this issue, I found that
>       If a corresponding NVRAM file already exists:
>               Then the Windows guest always can't be booted up.
>       If no NVRAM exits && "Windows Server 2003" boot option is in order 1:
>               Then the Windows guest can sometimes be booted up, but not
>always.
>
>This issue occurred from CS# 17290. So I think this issue is not caused by
>Akio Takebe' patch (17292) :-)
>
>I am using the pre-built binary included in efi-vfirmware of CS#99. Now I
>am trying to find the special action sequence that can certainly boot up
>Windows guest.
>
>Amy Mu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2008年3月25日 21:22
>To: Akio Takebe
>Cc: Mu, Qin; xen-ia64-devel
>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IPF Unstable CS#17292 Status Report
>
>
>On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 21:56 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
>> Hi, Amy
>>
>> >Failed case id                                      Description
>> >    SMPVTI_Windows                  SMPVTI windows(vcpu=2)
>> >    SMPWin_SMPVTI_SMPxenU   SMPVTI Linux/Windows & XenU
>> >    VTI_Windows_PV                  Windows VTI PV
>> If my patch(17292) is revert, can you boot Windows guest?
>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-ia64-unstable.hg?rev/dba5f548b894
>>
>
>   I booted a Win2k3 guest is my testing, so I'm curious about this too.
>How did it fail?  Thanks,
>
>       Alex
>
>--
>Alex Williamson                             HP Open Source & Linux Org.
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

vmx_fault.patch
Description: vmx_fault.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel