On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 07:22 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 02:15:34PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 06:10 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > a stripped-down version of a previous patch: reimplement vcpu_get_psr.
> > >
> > > Should be a noop, I don't think performance should be affected.
> >
> > Unfortunately...
> It's a little bit puzzling. I didn't think the performace of mov =psr.l was
> to important!
Yeah, I switched back and forth a couple times because I couldn't
quite believe it killed performance that much.
> Have you tested my other patch ? It should be independant from this one.
No, it may not functionally depend on the get_psr patch, but it
doesn't apply cleanly without it. Thanks,
Alex
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home