|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] make Xen assign meta-physical memory in spa
Tristan Gingold wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 05:52:57PM +0100, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> [...]
>> With these patches applied I am seeing PAL warnings about unimplemented
>> PAL call 42 and then a cachable vs uncacheable access in xenmisc.c.
>> Anyone else seeing this?
> Yes, PAL call 42 has never been implemented. A dummy implementation should be
> rather easy, but it's difficult to return an accurate value because of
> vcpu migration.
Hi Tristan,
Nice to see you're still popping up here :)
One thing I would like to see on the longer term is a feature allowing
a cpumask to be set for a vcpu so it is only schduled within cpus on a
specific physical node. That way this call would start making sense.
Cheers,
Jes
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
|
|
|
|