WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuf

from [Atsushi SAKAI] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuffer
From: Atsushi SAKAI <sakaia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 20:54:23 +0900
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 03:55:37 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: (Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:58:23 +0100") <878xhkm928.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <87lkmjptqq.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <874psydx6m.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611221150.kAMBoeEX021723@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87r6vv8ugo.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611240501.kAO51Ctv001860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <871wnt6za3.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200611281305.kASD5LMi024468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <873b833cc0.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200612011236.kB1Car3M023008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87ac27wl15.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200612040847.kB48lEpR008524@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <87irgrqwe5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200612051202.kB5C2GJI004049@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <874psap7ss.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200612070056.kB70u7XF027966@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <878xhkm928.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Hi, Markus

 I am checking VFB with SMP
with xen-ia64-unstable cset 12886.

But It seems strange behavior.
(call trace appeared from DomU xm console output)
Did you test it on SMP DomU? 
Of course UP DomU seems fine at this moment.

Thanks
Atsushi SAKAI




_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  [Xen-ia64-devel] Reserved Register/Field fault not correct handled in Xen?, Dietmar Hahn
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] PV framebuffer, Markus Armbruster
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy