WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]

To: "'You, Yongkang'" <yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx>, "'Alex Williamson'" <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
From: "yo.fujita" <yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 16:02:32 +0900
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:00:07 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <16A54BF5D6E14E4D916CE26C9AD30575044A24FF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcaRU6hiH8Ze/xczSLG3HcLhtigmQgB5sx3QAAB068AAARIZkAAKX41wAAB/uYA=
Hi Yongkang,

Thanks for your information!
We also must try the latest changeset.
If it happens again, the cause is in our environment.
I'll inform you a result. Please wait for a while.

Thanks,
Fujita
> -----Original Message-----
> From: You, Yongkang [mailto:yongkang.you@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 3:37 PM
> To: yo.fujita; Alex Williamson
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> 
> Hi Fujita,
> 
> I tried the latest Changeset 10419. But I couldn't reproduce this problem
in
> my box. Is it fixed? I create and destroy SMP XenU for more than 100
times.
> And try to make kernels in xenU 2 times. I didn't meet the xen0 hang.
> 
> My box has 3072M memory. Xen0 has 512M, xenU has 512M. XenU has been
assigned
> with 2 CPUs.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2006年6月19日 10:27
> >To: You, Yongkang; 'Alex Williamson'
> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> >
> >> Hi Fujita,
> >>
> >> Maybe it is not guest image issue. In our nightly testing for XenU, we
> >still
> >> focus on the UP stability and basic booting/destroying testing.
Automatic
> >SMP
> >> XenU isn't fully added into nightly testing (will add it this week). I
> >noticed
> >> your report mentioned that the stress testing and keeping
> >creating/destroying
> >> SMP XenU will catch this issue. I can do some trying to see if I can
> >reproduce.
> >Hi Yongkang,
> >
> >Thanks for your comments.
> >As you said, I meant the problem is not in the image itself but the
stress
> >of booting domU. In other words, I thought larger size image takes more
> >stress on Xen.
> >So I guess a customized image for testing (necessity minimum size)
doesn't
> >cause
> >the problem.
> >We appreciate it if you can try to reproduce these issues.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Fujita
> >
> >
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Yongkang (Kangkang) 永康
> >>
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: yo.fujita [mailto:yo.fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >Sent: 2006年6月19日 8:53
> >> >To: 'Alex Williamson'; You, Yongkang
> >> >Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Weekly benchmark results [ww24]
> >> >
> >> >>    Thanks Fujita.  Is anyone else seeing these hangs booting domU?
> >> >> The Intel status report on the same changeset has no indication of
> >> >> dom0 hangs on their tests.
> >> >Hi Alex, Yongkang,
> >> >
> >> > In Fujitsu, it's only me who saw this problem because few developers
> >have
> >> >started any tests relating to SMP.
> >> >I think the reason why Intel's results was not match to ours is the
> >> >difference of stress on booting SMP domU because the our guest image
is
> >just
> >> >only a copy of root file system of native Linux, which any functions
was
> >not
> >> >edited.
> >> >
> >> >My domU environment.
> >> >Disk size :5G
> >> >OS        :RHEL4U2
> >> >Memory    :512M
> >> >CPUs      :2
> >> >Yongkang, do you have any comments?
> >> >
> >> >> Has anything else changed in the test environment?  Thanks,
> >> >No. We switched this test to SMP from UP two weeks ago.
> >> >
> >> >Thanks,
> >> >Fujita



_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel