Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: adding a dom0_firmware_setup hypercall

Le Jeudi 25 Mai 2006 04:04, Isaku Yamahata a écrit :
> On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> > diff -r 303e1b6bf727 xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mk
> > --- a/xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mk        Sun May 21 07:49:46 2006 -0600
> > +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/Rules.mk        Tue May 23 14:44:22 2006 +0200
> > @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ CFLAGS    += -DCONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP
> >  CFLAGS     += -DCONFIG_XEN_IA64_DOM0_VP
> >  endif
> >  ifeq ($(no_warns),y)
> > -CFLAGS     += -Wa,--fatal-warnings
> > +CFLAGS     += -Wa,--fatal-warnings -Werror -Wno-uninitialized
> >  endif
> >
> >  LDFLAGS := -g
>
> This isn't the main focus of the patch...
> Why is -Wno-uninitialized needed? I think it's too daingerous.
-Wuninitialized is really version dependant.  Using gcc 4.1, I have a lot of 
these warnings, which may not appear with previous versions.

If we combine -Werror and -Wuninitialized, Xen may not compile with some 
configurations.

Tristan.


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH 3/3][RFC] paravirtualize vdso, Isaku Yamahata

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: adding a dom0_firmware_setup hypercall, Tristan Gingold

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: adding a dom0_firmware_setup hypercall, Isaku Yamahata

Next by Thread:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RFC: adding a dom0_firmware_setup hypercall, Tian, Kevin

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]