WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on dom

To: "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Yang, Fred" <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on domU on tip?
From: "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:57:03 -0800
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 19:01:29 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYBELBGMu7ZHSeYRUaEav49mCDvgwAAVFMwAADLrDAAIbQEoAARHDxgAAFwgsAApRrdUAAOEX2AABW4J/AAUJyDYAAareHQABB8dxAAG8N+UAAfdswgAHxIyvAAUT7r4AA1yRngAAI62ZAAAdDu4AA+fyHQAB1kTdA=
Thread-topic: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on domU on tip?
Oops!  Sorry!  Fixed and committed. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Xu, Anthony [mailto:anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 10:01 PM
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Yang, Fred; 
> Tian, Kevin; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] 
> Console problem on domU on tip?
> 
> Dan,
> Progress argument must be initialized to 0 in function 
> sync_split_caches.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Anthony
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) 
> [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
> >Sent: 2005年12月29日 7:09
> >To: Yang, Fred; Xu, Anthony; Tian, Kevin; 
> xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >Subject: RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] 
> Console problem on
> >domU on tip?
> >
> >Excellent!  So now we understand the root cause?  It
> >is a bug in Linux code which is old (using an outdated
> >SDM) and unused!  Perhaps you should submit a patch to
> >linux-ia64 as well?
> >
> >I still think it is useful to only call the sync code
> >on machines where it is necessary but will apply
> >Anthony's patch on top of the dynamic checking patch
> >(probably later this week).
> >
> >Thanks!
> >Dan
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Yang, Fred [mailto:fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 3:35 PM
> >> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Xu, Anthony;
> >> Tian, Kevin; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel]
> >> Console problem on domU on tip?
> >>
> >> Dan,
> >>
> >> You can goto
> >> http://developer.intel.com/design/itanium/manuals/iiasdmanual.
> >> htm to download new SDM.  The psr.ic=1 in calling PAL had
> >> been implemented into PAL since 2002, so is HP's PAL.
> >>
> >> The correct way is to run with PSR.ic=1 and let TLB miss
> >> handler code to handle Dside miss.
> >>
> >> Please refer to section 11.9.2.1.3 Making PAL Procedure Calls
> >> in Physical or Virtual Mode in SDM Volume#2.  It specifically
> >> called out "with psr.ic=1 to handle any TLB faults that could
> >> occur" in the spec
> >>
> >> So, Anthony's psr.ic=1 patch is still valid since Xen only
> >> maps PAL with ITR not DTR
> >>
> >> -Fred
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> >> > Just working for a brief time today...
> >> >
> >> > I just committed a fix that changes the compile-time CONFIG
> >> > to a run-time test.  Please verify that this runtime test
> >> > works on the future processor.
> >> >
> >> > Anthony, Fred -- If PAL code were not pinned, we would not
> >> > get a nested DTLB miss.
> >> >
> >> > Kevin, Anthony -- The SDM description of the PAL_CACHE_FLUSH
> >> > call states that psr.ic must be turned off for this call.
> >> > (Note that my SDM is quite old so this may have changed
> >> > in subsequent revisions.)
> >> >
> >> > Dan
> >>
> >>
> 
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel