WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on dom

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "Xu, Anthony" <anthony.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on domU on tip?
From: "Yang, Fred" <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:34:42 -0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 22:38:41 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYBELBGMu7ZHSeYRUaEav49mCDvgwAAVFMwAADLrDAAIbQEoAARHDxgAAFwgsAApRrdUAAOEX2AABW4J/AAUJyDYAAareHQABB8dxAAG8N+UAAfdswgAHxIyvAAUT7r4AA1yRngAAI62ZA=
Thread-topic: CONFIG_IA64_SPLIT_CACHE was: [Xen-ia64-devel] Console problem on domU on tip?
Dan,

You can goto
http://developer.intel.com/design/itanium/manuals/iiasdmanual.htm to
download new SDM.  The psr.ic=1 in calling PAL had been implemented into
PAL since 2002, so is HP's PAL.

The correct way is to run with PSR.ic=1 and let TLB miss handler code to
handle Dside miss.

Please refer to section 11.9.2.1.3 Making PAL Procedure Calls in
Physical or Virtual Mode in SDM Volume#2.  It specifically called out
"with psr.ic=1 to handle any TLB faults that could occur" in the spec

So, Anthony's psr.ic=1 patch is still valid since Xen only maps PAL with
ITR not DTR

-Fred
 


Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> Just working for a brief time today...
> 
> I just committed a fix that changes the compile-time CONFIG
> to a run-time test.  Please verify that this runtime test
> works on the future processor.
> 
> Anthony, Fred -- If PAL code were not pinned, we would not
> get a nested DTLB miss.
> 
> Kevin, Anthony -- The SDM description of the PAL_CACHE_FLUSH
> call states that psr.ic must be turned off for this call.
> (Note that my SDM is quite old so this may have changed
> in subsequent revisions.)
> 
> Dan


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>