This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "Byrne, John \(HP Labs\)" <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 08:25:44 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 00:23:32 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWvZqLq66NFDvT0SxG0t4WzIxQpTQAANxPQAPEyzMAABo/zoAAhfg1QABNlThAAJ/NpUAAGopdQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
Ha, yes. At least I see a new extra page required now for xen console, just 
like previous xenstore page. You may need to sync xen-ia64-unstable.hg first 
and I will take a look. (Maybe same thing needs for xenlinux-ia64?)


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) [mailto:dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx]
>Sent: 2005年9月9日 5:17
>To: Tian, Kevin; Byrne, John (HP Labs)
>Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
>> >> BTW, I'll send out the tools change
>> >> to xen mailing list, since some common code is changed upon ia64.
>> >
>> >Yes, it will be interesting to see if it gets in.  I hope it
>> >does, but in the past Keir has been resistant to ifdef code.
>> >
>> >Please keep track of it and let us all know if it gets in!
>> Yes, too many ifdefs are unacceptable. If the news is bad, we
>> have to find other way, like trying to catch up with x86
>> behavior closely to reduce such branches. ;-(
>Per Keir's response/permission, we can put the patch into
>xen-ia64-unstable and he will pull it in the next update.
>First, however, it appears that we are behind again... I tried
>applying the patch against xen-unstable tip and the patch
>applied only with many hunk offsets.  The result didn't
>compile (though probably not due to this specific patch).

Xen-ia64-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>