WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] dmidecode doesn't work under xen 4.1.1 on certain hardwa

To: Anthony Wright <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] dmidecode doesn't work under xen 4.1.1 on certain hardware
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:13:22 -0400
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 07:15:59 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E7C9C8B.2010108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4E7C6BDC.8070005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110923133200.GC19579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E7C9C8B.2010108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 03:49:47PM +0100, Anthony Wright wrote:
> On 23/09/2011 14:32, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:22:04PM +0100, Anthony Wright wrote:
> >> I have a xen 4.1.1 with a 3.0.4 linux kernel running on a Supermicro
> >> Supermicro X8DTL-iF motherboard with 16GB of RAM.
> >>
> >> If I run the 3.0.4 kernel on the bare metal dmidecode works fine. If I
> > Can you attach the beginning of the kernel bootup log? It should
> > have some entry about 1-1 mappings. Make sure to run Linux with "debug 
> > loglevel=8"
> Please find attached.

> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000] 1-1 mapping on 9a->100
> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000] 1-1 mapping on bf780->100000
> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000] Set 264422 page(s) to 1-1 mapping.
> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000] BIOS-provided physical RAM map:
> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000]  Xen: 0000000000000000 - 
> 0000000000099000 (usable)
> 2011 Sep 23 14:45:41 kernel: [    0.000000]  Xen: 0000000000099800 - 
> 0000000000100000 (reserved)
.. snip..

So 99C00 is right at cusp of 'usuable' and 'reserved'. Meaning that region
falls within the 4KB page. And we did not set the 1-1 mapping for 99 (we
started at 9A).

But now that I think of it - this is Linux E820 which does get modified.
Can you also provide  the hypervisor E820 output? You can get 'xl dmesg'
for that. That should provide the "virgin" output of the e820 which we
use for 1-1 mapping.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel