|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm,	possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more mess
 
Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl 
(fwd)"):
> I think I have found the issue: if blktap2 is not enabled xl is going to
> start qemu (to provide a disk backend) even if it is not actually needed
> because the user wants to use blkback.
> 
> We have a patch upstream to fix this issue but it hasn't been backported
> to 4.1:
Thanks, I have applied it to 4.1.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, David Vrabel
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Ian Campbell
 - Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm,	possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more messages],
Ian Jackson <=
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |