|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl
 
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 08:54 -0400, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > We have a patch upstream to fix this issue but it hasn't been backported
> > > to 4.1:
> > 
> > Thanks, sounds like this will fix my problem.
> > 
> > Is there any chance that this is going to be in 4.1.2 final?
> 
> I think it should be!
Ack!
I'm sure I asked for it before, must've fallen through the cracks.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, David Vrabel
 
- [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl,
Ian Campbell <=
 - Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm,	possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more messages], Ian Jackson
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |