|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix
* On Mon, Jul 04, 2011 at 09:49:48AM +0100, Ian Campbell <ijc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Mon, 2011-07-04 at 04:55 +0530, Raghavendra D Prabhu wrote:
[Sorry if duplicate, one earlier was corrupt]
Hi,
I got section mismatches reported by modpost in latest build. It got
reported for xen_register_pirq and xen_unplug_emulated_devices
functions.
xen_register_pirq makes reference to
acpi_sci_override_gsi in init.data section; marking
xen_register_pirq with __init is not feasible since calls are made
to it from acpi_register_gsi in non-init contexts. So marking it
__refdata based on assumption that when acpi_sci_override_gsi is
referenced, it is in early stages where it is alive.
I don't think this assumption holds, since xen_register_pirq can be
called at any time and basically unconditionally references
acpi_sci_override_gsi.
Yeah, that has been my guess as well, however I am not privy to the
inner workings of Xen, so was not sure.
If we don't want to remove the __init from acpi_sci_override_gsi then
perhaps xen_setup_acpi_sci needs to stash it somewhere?
Or maybe xen_register_pirq could take an "int force_irq" which, if not
-1, would force a particular IRQ. The callsite in xen_setup_acpi_sci
(actually via xen_register_gsi so the param would need to be propagated
there) would be the only actual user?
xen_register_gsi and hence, xen_register_pirq are called from
init (with xen_setup_acpi_sci) and non-init (with
acpi_register_gsi_xen); since xen_set_acpi_sci calls it with gsi ==
acpi_sci_override_gsi and is marked __init, the best way would be to
call xen_register_gsi and xen_register_pirq with a boolean argument like
sci_override to obviate the need to use acpi_sci_override_gsi in
register_pirq. I will send the patch with this change if it looks good.
The xen_unplug_emulated_devices change looks correct to me since
xen_unplug_emulated_devices is called from xen_arch_hvm_post_suspend.
Ian.
--------------------------
Raghavendra Prabhu
GPG Id : 0xD72BE977
Fingerprint: B93F EBCB 8E05 7039 CD3C A4B8 A616 DCA1 D72B E977
www: wnohang.net
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
Virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Raghavendra D Prabhu
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Ian Campbell
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix,
Raghavendra D Prabhu <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- [Xen-devel] Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Raghavendra D Prabhu
- [Xen-devel] Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- [Xen-devel] Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [TOME] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Ian Campbell
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Raghavendra D Prabhu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Raghavendra D Prabhu
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Modpost section mismatch fix, Raghavendra D Prabhu
|
|
|
|
|