| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up
|
To: |
"'Zhang, Fengzhe'" <IMCEAEX-_O=INTEL_OU=EXCHANGE+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP+20+28FYDIBOHF23SPDLT+29_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=FZHAN17@xxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up |
|
From: |
"Li, Xin" <xin.li@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:05:22 +0800 |
|
Accept-language: |
zh-CN, en-US |
|
Acceptlanguage: |
zh-CN, en-US |
|
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:07:29 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4D5CDB77.2010607@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<1A42CE6F5F474C41B63392A5F80372B2335E978D@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D5BF2FE02000078000322EB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D5C68AF.3030807@xxxxxxxxx> <4D5CE1DE0200007800032557@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D5CDB77.2010607@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
AcvOfE1NYumP3YxZQXOzRrlYxgYd0Q3F7Uzg |
|
Thread-topic: |
[PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up |
> >>>
> >> IRQ_PER_CPU switch is not found in current Kconfig. I'm not sure if this
> >
> > kernel/irq/Kconfig (introduced as a generic option in 2.6.38-rc2). In
> > prior kernel you'd have to add a respective Kconfig item in
> > drivers/xen/Kconfig.
> >
> >> feature is going to be brought back in the short term. I remove the
> >> ifdef to set IRQ_PER_CPU flag in desc by default but still leave the IRQ
> >> handling logic unchanged. This is a temporary solution to fix system
> >> crash on poweroff. And this is the fix with minimum impact among the
> >> several solutions we tried.
> >
> > But it's more a hack than a fix. And making per-CPU IRQs properly
>
> Yes, that's true. Switching on IRQ_PER_CPU can make this patch neat. But
> that isn't my call.
Jeremy, would you consider the change to fix this issue?
Thanks!
-Xin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] irq: Exclude percpu IRQs from being fixed up,
Li, Xin <=
|
|
|
| |
|
Home