WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/re

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/3] xen: Use PM/Hibernate events for save/restore/chkpt
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:24:47 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@xxxxxxxxx>, "linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 10:25:18 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102251713560.19277@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1298157158-5421-1-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx> <201102241941.00984.rjw@xxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1102251713560.19277@kaball-desktop>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.38-rc6+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; )
On Friday, February 25, 2011, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > I believe it only "[PATCH 3/3] PM: pm.h - Add comments about Xen 
> > > save/restore/chkpt use case"
> > > 
> > > (http://marc.info/?i=1298157158-5421-4-git-send-email-rshriram@xxxxxxxxx)
> > 
> > This particular one should go in _after_ the functional patches.
> > 
> > > I or Stefano (these patches are against Ian's tree which is againsts 
> > > Stefano's
> > > tree) can take the other patches and stick Pavel's Ack, Rafeal's Ack, 
> > > Ian's Ack
> > > on them and also my Signed-off for the Xen bits.
> > > 
> > > I think that would work?
> > 
> > In fact, I think it's better if all patches go through the Xen tree.
> > 
>  
> I don't mind taking them but if they have to go after your
> suspend-2.6/linux-next tree this would introduce a new dependency in the
> branch I am preparing for linux-next myself.
> 
> Should I pull your suspend-2.6/linux-next tree into my linux-next branch?
> Considering that this could create conflicts in linux-next if you
> force-push your tree with some new changes and I don't update my version
> of it, maybe it is better if I pull only a reduced version of it with
> just the strict dependencies?

It's not that simple, I think you'd need to pull my entire linux-next branch
because of the dependencies between commits in there.

Alternatively, I can take the entire $subject patchset.

Still, I'd like the discussion to settle before anyway.

Thanks,
Rafael

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>