xen-devel
tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule)
>>> On 11.01.11 at 19:28, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> After consultation with Keir, here's a revised proposal:
>
> Feature submission freeze
> after 31 Dec
>
> New feature patches posted before this point can be committed
> afterwards if they needed the time to get into shape.
>
> New features not previously posted have missed the boat.
Based on 4.0 experience, I'm afraid we'll have to default-disable
tmem again for 4.1, since (to my knowledge) there hasn't been
much (if any) work to eliminate non-order-0 post-boot allocations.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Freeze schedule, Ian Jackson
- [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule, Ian Jackson
- [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule, Ian Jackson
- tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule),
Jan Beulich <=
- RE: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Jan Beulich
- [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Tim Deegan
- RE: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Sander Eikelenboom
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Keir Fraser
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Olivier B.
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Ian Campbell
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Olivier B.
- Re: [PATCH] Re: tmem on 4.1 (was [Xen-devel] Re: Freeze schedule), Jan Beulich
|
|
|