On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alexander Graf wrote:
>
> On 29.11.2010, at 17:06, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 29.11.2010, at 16:10, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 23.11.2010, at 20:51, Anthony.Perard@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> From: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here is the V7 of the patch series that adds Xen device model support
> >>>>> in QEMU.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The change made on it since the v6:
> >>>>> - I introduce a patch from Alexander Graf to add a generic layer for
> >>>>> the Xen calls.
> >>>>> - So compatibility support have been transformed from macros to
> >>>>> function.
> >>>>> - Now, xenfv machine uses a new field default_machine_opts to specify
> >>>>> that Xen will be use.
> >>>>> - in xen_init, xen_mode is override to XEN_ATTACH if it was XEN_EMULATE.
> >>>>
> >>>> Please try to compile the code on Xen 4.0 :). I'm just trying to rebase
> >>>> xenner against your tree and the build already fails because of missing
> >>>> xen_common.h includes.
> >>>
> >>> :(, I don't have any error with both Xen 4.0.{0,1}.
> >>>
> >>> # Configured with: '../configure' '--target-list=i386-softmmu'
> >>> '--enable-xen'
> >>> '--extra-cflags=-I/tmp/xen/xen-4.0.1/dist/install/usr/include'
> >>> '--extra-ldflags=-L/tmp/xen/xen-4.0.1/dist/install/usr/lib'
> >>>
> >>> Did you use other options with your configure?
> >>> Where are the missings includes?
> >>> Also, I only compile on 32bits.
> >>
> >> Ugh. Yes, my bad. It broke in my xenner patches :). Sorry. The issue was
> >> that #include "xen_interfaces.h" without a preceding #include
> >> "xen_common.h" breaks. Maybe it'd be good to move the "xen_common.h"
> >> include into "xen.h"? Doesn't really matter though. I'll try to take on a
> >> code review today, so we can merge the patches asap!
> >
> > Actually, it's better to put "#include xen_common.h" in xen_interfaces.h
> > because I use stuff from there.
>
> The rest looks very good, so I'm optimistic we'll have a well mergable
> version this week :).
I hope so :)
Thanks for your review!
--
Anthony PERARD
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home