 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] wrong vmexit size in xenalyze
| To: | George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] wrong vmexit size in xenalyze |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:07:12 +0100 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 19 Nov 2010 02:08:24 -0800 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1290161244; l=606; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=WCPOD2f+E5fMbwZtEtJMf+meu9c=; b=J0dU1UkZXztPP3HkvDAU4CJND1FYAakYgpcBlQyMfHx+7ABCbuL70cLJlqW39yC9LQc FrCh/uyOB+yk6ZSR2YFzUEzIfIEVseGXBGhGY8IdO4jbirBFi/Nd2tdeNyTcSY4az9aEk enc8wgY7p/Y4oXeKn5nF8af65GsKXuR+05I= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4CE6484B.9000707@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <C90BF541.A851%keir@xxxxxxx> <4CE6484B.9000707@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Nov 19, George Dunlap wrote: > If you have a better idea, I'm open to it. A bit more discipline -- > doing an audit of the tracing after the feature freeze before each > release -- would be helpful; some automated testing would be even > more helpful. I think the extra u32 is just padding and can be ignored. Whats the purpose of the ->extra_bytes checks? If its just a data integrity check, it can be removed because reading past the end of the record data should not harm. Maybe limit the loops which iterate ->extra_bytes to 7 because more doesnt fit in a trace record. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] is a pure usermode backend possible?, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 2755: all pass, xen . org |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] wrong vmexit size in xenalyze, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] wrong vmexit size in xenalyze, George Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
