On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 08:26 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
> diff -r 3985fea87987 tools/libxl/libxl.idl
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.idl Fri Sep 10 19:06:33 2010 +0100
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.idl Wed Sep 15 09:19:02 2010 +0200
> @@ -43,7 +43,11 @@ SHUTDOWN_* constant."""),
> ], destructor_fn=None)
>
> libxl_poolinfo = Struct("poolinfo", [
> - ("poolid", uint32)
> + ("poolid", uint32),
> + ("sched_id", uint32),
> + ("n_dom", uint32),
> + ("cpumap_size", uint32),
> + ("cpumap", libxl_cpumap)
> ], destructor_fn=None)
>
> libxl_vminfo = Struct("vminfo", [
Does the addition of the cpumap field here mean that we now need to
generate a destructor function (by removing destructor_fn=None) and call
it e.g. from main_pool*?
Would it make sense to turn libxl_cpumap into a struct containing both
the size and the data pointer?
> diff -r 3985fea87987 tools/libxl/libxl.h
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.h Fri Sep 10 19:06:33 2010 +0100
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.h Wed Sep 15 09:19:02 2010 +0200
> @@ -471,6 +471,15 @@ int libxl_device_net2_del(libxl_ctx *ctx
> int libxl_device_net2_del(libxl_ctx *ctx, libxl_device_net2 *net2,
> int wait);
>
> +int libxl_get_freecpus(libxl_ctx *ctx, int *n_cpus, uint64_t **cpumap);
> +int libxl_create_cpupool(libxl_ctx *ctx, char *name, int schedid,
> + uint64_t *cpumap, int n_cpus, libxl_uuid *uuid,
> + uint32_t *poolid);
Should these cpumap parameters be libxl_cpumap* or are they a different sort of
cpumap?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home