xen-devel
Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface
On 04/08/2010 08:01, "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> So long as it gets renamed to 'node_id' in the info structure I'm okay with
>>> it. That doesn't preclude simply setting that field to 0...nr_vnodes-1 and
>>> doing translation in the hypervisor, but also leaves us a bit of
>>> flexibility.
>> Yes, I like this idea. Will do that.
> Ack, that sounds good. So we have virtual nodes, virtual physical nodes
> and machine nodes.
The index into the 'node table' in the informational structure would have no
particular relevance in this scheme.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, (continued)
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dulloor
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dulloor
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dulloor
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Andre Przywara
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dulloor
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Andre Przywara
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Andre Przywara
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Keir Fraser
- Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface, Dulloor
|
|
|