WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] can't create any more pv-on-hvm domains after~38under 3.

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] can't create any more pv-on-hvm domains after~38under 3.3-testing
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:59:21 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 04:00:10 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D0154FE68@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AclTmGJLz8h42+pCRU+dWJTw8j7bUgBnCiZwAAEjtigAABg8AAAAbiyoAAB7+zAAAFwWbQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] can't create any more pv-on-hvm domains after~38under 3.3-testing
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.14.0.081024
On 03/12/2008 11:53, "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> So just to clarify, would this be a page which has been granted in a
> DomU's grant table and then either given to Dom0 via an entry in xenbus
> or via a ringbuffer request? The former seems more likely as I wouldn't
> have thought that there would be a request in flight every single time,
> and then probably not only a single request.

Yes, exactly. It's probably the ring page itself rather than a grant
transmitted over a ring.

> And it wouldn't be any use me dumping DomU's 'PFN' either would it? As
> that would be different to the real physical PFN...

Yes, which is why you'd want to print the address in dom0.

In answer to your other email -- yes, a domain does not die until all its
pages are freed.

 -- Keir


> I'm using a kernel from Debian (that may be the cause of the problem in
> itself actually...) which is 2.6.18 and claims to have the 3.3 patches
> applied. I might pursue that angle first. Blkback and netback are
> compiled into the kernel which makes debugging a bit harder.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>