| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: non-zero order allocations in shadow code may prevent li
At 12:28 +0100 on 27 Sep (1190896090), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Nevertheless I would think that
> even for HVM domains the shadow shouldn't need to make its entire
> allocation in order 2 chunks, but could limit this to just the amount it
> really
> knows it'll need (1 per vCPU as I understand it),
For correctness, yes. At least 1 per process in the working set for
anything like reasonable performance.
> then continue with order 1
> chunks (not sure about their count, but for forward progress I think you'll
> need at most 6 {,f}l1_32_shadow pages per vCPU).
ISTR the number came out at something unpleasant like thirteen after all
the VAs you might need for a single x86 instruction were accounted for.
But then we realised that even a heavily pessimistic lower bound was so
far below the threshold of acceptable performance that it wasn't worth
being precise. :)
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home