| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: non-zero order allocations in shadow code may prevent li
At 12:19 +0100 on 27 Sep (1190895561), Jan Beulich wrote:
> So then I'll go ahead with implementing the described change (I'm actually
> intending to have shadow_prealloc() take not just an order, but also a count
> parameter - in a number of places it is being called with SHADOW_MAX_ORDER
> for no reason other than wanting 3 or 4 single pages).
shadow_prealloc could just as easily take no arguments and always free
four pages in the highest order that's in use. There's no real benefit
from fine-tuning it as the operations that free shadow memory operate in
much bigger increments anyway.
Cheers,
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XenSource UK Limited
Registered office c/o EC2Y 5EB, UK; company number 05334508
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home