WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [libxc] add missing free in xc_finish_mmu_update

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch] [libxc] add missing free in xc_finish_mmu_updates to avoid memory leak
From: Stephan Creutz <stephan.creutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2007 16:03:29 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 07 Apr 2007 07:02:45 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C23C7D5F.584B%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20070406154532.38961761.stephan.creutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C23C7D5F.584B%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 22:42:39 +0100
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 6/4/07 14:45, "Stephan Creutz" <stephan.creutz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
> > the following patch adds a missing free to xc_finish_mmu_updates,
> > otherwise the memory allocated by xc_init_mmu_updates gets never
> > freed.
> 
> The only user of this interface calls free() on that memory itself. It
> also calls finish_mmu_update() more than once on the same mmu
> structure, so freeing it in finish_mmu_update() would not work.
> Probably best we rename xc_init_mmu_updates() to
> xc_alloc_mmu_updates(), finish_mmu_update to flush_mmu_updates(), and
> document the need for explicit free() in the header file. I'll do
> this.

Oops, overlooked that, but xc_finish_mmu_updates sounded like a
destructor. The new function names you propose and the comment should
clear things up. But I would disagree to make the whole interface
private (read that in the staging changelog) because otherwise I will
have to duplicate the code for a program I'm working on (see my post
recently before). On the other hand it would be a minimal effort to
recode that for my needs.

Stephan

Attachment: pgparq0WzXAS3.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel