On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 13:09 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 18:44 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-08-23 at 15:36 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > Since this is one of the few things which would prevent you using a
> > > 3.0.2 dom0 on a 3.0.3 hypervisor I'm going to add the backwards compat
> > > stuff to the dom0 builder.
> > >
> > > Changes will probably needed to ia64 and powerpc but I'll get back to
> > > you on that...
> > I've now done this, it should come through as changesets 11244-11246.
> You may not realize this, but those numbers you're using are specific to
> a particular tree. Instead, please use the changeset hash, because that
> refers to the same changeset no matter what tree it's in.
Sorry, I did know that I just forgot... At any rate the original set I
was talking about were:
And the second set (re-adding __xen_guest to dom0) were:
(I left the cset number in too so you can correlate with my earlier
> At any rate, it seems these patches have not been moved out of the
> private staging tree, so I really can't comment on them.
Sure, this was more of a heads up that they were coming ;-)
Xen-devel mailing list