RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effec

To:	"Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
From:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 15:07:44 +0800
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 16 Aug 2006 00:09:02 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfOAAuHctAAJFLMkAA1uYtQAAY5wukAV7GSUA==
Thread-topic:	[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?

>
>Looks like it could be a 32-on-64 issue if you're running 64-bit Xen.
>Perhaps the current test for this situation, in hvm_do_hypercall() in
>arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c, is broken. It just tests 
>guest_paging_levels, but that
>may not work if paging is disabled. That's probably where you 
>should look if
>you're trying to debug this.

This patch fixes the HVM hypercall issue when paging is not enabled yet
on 64bit host.

Signed-off-by: Xin Li <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>

fix_hvm_hypercall.patch
Description: fix_hvm_hypercall.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?