[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective

To:	"Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
From:	Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:37:12 +0100
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:46:04 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<0EBFB99D260C5B40AC33E0F807B1AD66CE7A21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfOAAuHctAAJFLMkA==
Thread-topic:	Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.5.060620



On 12/8/06 4:20 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Just found the code in hvmloader.c seems not work.
> hvm_param.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> hvm_param.index = HVM_PARAM_APIC_ENABLED;
> if (!hypercall_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &hvm_param) &&
> hvm_param.value)
> create_mp_tables();
> 
> Need more investigation.

The use of HVMOP_get_param in hvmloader was inconsistent with its
implementation within Xen. This is now fixed in c/s 11070. Thanks for
pointing out the problem!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?