WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] minor copy&paste error in vmx.c ?

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] minor copy&paste error in vmx.c ?
From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:05:11 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 10:05:46 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C0FCA7F6.90E%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C0FCA7F6.90E%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060713)
Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
> 
> On 6/8/06 1:33 pm, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> with that change in place i get the following when trying to boot a
>> OpenBSD/AMD64 kernel:
>>
>> (XEN) (GUEST: 1) Booting from CD-Rom...
>> (XEN) invalid cr: 8
> 
> Perhaps cr8 isn't emulated properly. Probably not very hard to fix if that's
> the case.

netbsd/amd64 fails in a similiar way:

(XEN) invalid cr: 8
(XEN) __hvm_bug at vmx.c:1822
(XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0-unstable    Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU:    1
(XEN) RIP:    0008:[<ffffffff802c6b8d>]
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000246   CONTEXT: hvm
(XEN) rax: 0000000000000000   rbx: 0000000000000000   rcx: ffffffff80a5a420
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000000286   rsi: 0000000000000001   rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) rbp: 0000000000000000   rsp: ffffffff80aa4ef0   r8:  ffffffff803a2400
(XEN) r9:  0000000000000720   r10: ffffffff80aa4ed0   r11: 0000000000000008
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14: 0000000000000000
(XEN) r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 000000008005003b   cr3: 00000000b21f6000
(XEN) ds: 0010   es: 0010   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: 0010   cs: 0008
(XEN) domain_crash_sync called from vmx.c:1822
(XEN) Domain 24 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#1:
(XEN) ----[ Xen-3.0-unstable    Not tainted ]----
(XEN) CPU:    1
(XEN) RIP:    0008:[<ffffffff802c6b8d>]
(XEN) RFLAGS: 0000000000000246   CONTEXT: hvm
(XEN) rax: 0000000000000000   rbx: 0000000000000000   rcx: ffffffff80a5a420
(XEN) rdx: 0000000000000286   rsi: 0000000000000001   rdi: 0000000000000000
(XEN) rbp: 0000000000000000   rsp: ffffffff80aa4ef0   r8:  ffffffff803a2400
(XEN) r9:  0000000000000720   r10: ffffffff80aa4ed0   r11: 0000000000000008
(XEN) r12: 0000000000000000   r13: 0000000000000000   r14: 0000000000000000
(XEN) r15: 0000000000000000   cr0: 000000008005003b   cr3: 00000000b21f6000
(XEN) ds: 0010   es: 0010   fs: 0000   gs: 0000   ss: 0010   cs: 0008

netbsd/amd64 is actually able to get much further then OpenBSD/AMD64 -
but both seem to suffer from the same bug/issue.
OpenBSD/i386 and NetBSD/386 seem to work fine as a VT guest btw.

Stefan

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>