RE: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support fixes
A 64bit guest would never have any entry on pvmlinux?, since the code on
opd_kernel.c, line 112 ( of oprofile ), hardcodes the addresses in the
range of 0xC0100000 - 0xC060000. The 64bits guest has a complete
Renato, seu nome parece um nome Brasileiro.
From: Ray Bryant [mailto:raybry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 9:01 AM
Cc: Santos, Jose Renato G; Yang, Xiaowei; DaSilva, Rosilmildo
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support
BTW, the HVM guest I am running (and hence the passive image) is a
guest. We've run experiments with 32 bit guests and we do get pvmlinux
samples. There may be other differences between these experiments,
this is the only one we've been able to identify thus far.
So perhaps there is something broken about kernel samples in a passive
and 64 bit?
AMD Performance Labs Austin, Tx
512-602-0038 (o) 512-507-7807 (c)
Xen-devel mailing list