This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Management API Draft, version 0.4

To: Harry Butterworth <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Management API Draft, version 0.4
From: Ewan Mellor <ewan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 14:19:34 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 06:19:58 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1152278206.7717.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20060703155332.GA5002@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1152278206.7717.47.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 02:16:45PM +0100, Harry Butterworth wrote:

> I may be misreading the document but it seems to me like you've
> constrained the class definition such that all of the construtor
> parameters have accessor methods.
> I think this may be a bit unnatural and I think any required accessor
> methods for constructor parameters are just a special case of accessor
> methods required in general and they in turn are just a special case of
> general purpose methods like the ones required to drive the vm
> lifecycle.

You've lost me.  Could you give an example?


Xen-devel mailing list