| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 1/2] build: clean up kclean and distclean for ker
On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 02:32:18PM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
>
> On 29 Jun 2006, at 10:18, Horms wrote:
>
> >The version of this patch that I sent earlier today was bogus as
> >it was actually a duplicate of the 2nd patch I sent in this patch
> >([PATCH 2/2] build: make linux download more flexible).
> >This is what it should have looked like.
> >
> >The second patch itself should be fine as sent earlier today.
>
> These patches seem to churn the build system a bit but I'm not clear
> how much they improve things. What do they improve? Anyone else
> interested in seeing them committed?
I feel that what they improve is farily clearly listed in the inline
comments. I'm happy to trim them down if some bits are unwanted.
But I do believe they significantly improve the semantics of
both downloads and distclean. I have tested them quite extensively
over serveral months now (though oviously not the minor updates I made
yesterday relating to $LINUX_VER vs $LINUX_SRC, and I can confirm that
at least in my environment they work well.
--
Horms
H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home