|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][FIX] Possible fix for spurious interrupts
>
>> Looks like it cures it completely for me. I've got the same box
>> running
>> the same load that used to send irq16 through the roof, and it's
>> currently pegged at:
>>
>> 16: 0 0 0 0 Phys-irq uhci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
>>
>> Thanks!
>
>Actually, it seems the patch doesn't entirely work for multi-processor
>domain 0 as the wrong local APIC is sometimes prodded to do the EOI
>cycle. This was partially hidden by the fact that IRQ ffinity is also
>currently broken in our Linux tree (we need to call move_irq()
>in a few
Yes, this patch seems hang the SMP dom0 system at all, even pressing
ctrl-A 3 times won't response.
So, waiting for your complete fix :-)
-Xin
>choice places). I'll get a complete fix for all this stuff into
>xen-unstable today. Probably the meat of the patch should wait a while
>before going into the -testing tree, but we'll want to get
>something in
>there before 3.0.2-3.
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Xen-devel mailing list
>Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH][FIX] Possible fix for spurious interrupts,
Li, Xin B <=
|
|
|
|
|