|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
On 13 Apr 2006, at 21:29, Ky Srinivasan wrote:
Given that the function __sync_single() can be called in an interrupt
context, why do we call a potentially blocking function
(__copy_to_user) from within this function?
Good point. Would __copy_to_user_inatomic() be safe? It avoids
might_sleep(). We know that the page fault itself (if any) will not
block on I/O -- we only use __copy_to_user() to safely catch the fault
and return.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|