WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] upgrading from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2

To: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] upgrading from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2
From: "rhce admin" <rhceadmin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:14:59 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:16:02 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=G0rlYC7vT2rIQ2aoWN3DpRvyohQ8EaaQUNX0bKSNpL0+S0HifBeotSMk65UtQvsya/Sd8W0ZXb0m3y+MpiFKAHizzclDV76k8aG3UGbbRgEdlgSr2OSS40g/luUQxG5yHYBIgoWDST7EXcqFBfy9/m7nn7lyop8AcsknX5q9GyU=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77DCEBF51@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77DCEBF51@trantor>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Looked closer at my failed upgrades this morning. It appears that "/etc/init.d/*" is being overwritten. Only "/etc/init.d/xend" and "/etc/init.d/xendomains" remain in the "/etc/init.d" directory after running install.sh. These are both Fedora Core 2 systems. I assume that the install.sh script has changed the way that it copies over. Anyine else seen this?

On 4/8/06, James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The second one refuses to start xend properly for some reason, but I
> just noticed it is pointing at a local but unmaintained Debian
> repository, so everything is much more out of date than it should be.
> I'm upgrading it now.

Actually, it turns out I didn't update a link on the tftp server so it
was still booting 2.6.12 from 3.0.1. Working fine now.

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>