This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question

To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] linux TPM changes question
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:25:19 -0500
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:38:04 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <43F21569.76F0.0078.0@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 02/14/2006 11:37:45 AM:

> While there has been a new (conditionalized) call to
> del_singleshot_timer_sync() added, the old instance hasn't been
> deleted (other than the parallel atomic_set(&chip->data_pending,
> 0)). Is this intentional? If so, how is this supposed
> to work?

This has most likely been introduced during the recent merging with newer kernel trees.

-- Stefan
Xen-devel mailing list
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>