This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process

To: "Matt Ayres" <matta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process
From: "Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:40:13 -0000
Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 08:49:25 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcYjmAxsHg9IdjT6TUqrmuBGgRAuXwATXffA
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process
> Current -unstable will become 3.0.1, correct?  I am wondering 
> as the Novell guys' CFQ scheduler is turning out to be very 
> useful and with no troubles so far.  It'd be nice to get this 
> included in 3.0.1.

Yes. There's a lot of regression tests running on current -unstable at
the moment, but if users could give it a thorough kick-about too that
would be great.

We may sweep -unstable into -testing a day or two ahead of the 3.0.1
release so that work on -unstable can continue while we wait for a
couple of bug fix patches to get tested. (I'd really like to see the ip
checksum issue that effects some setups fixed in 3.0.1) 


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>