This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process

To: "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RE: [Xen-devel] RE: New Release Process
From: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 01:15:28 +0100
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:24:38 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017306AB9DDE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Kurt Garloff <garloff@xxxxxxx>, "Nakajima, Jun" <jun.nakajima@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: SUSE/Novell
References: <7F740D512C7C1046AB53446D3720017306AB9DDE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Hi Jun,

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 11:42:48AM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote:
> I think it would be better if we incorporate them one by one, not them
> together on the _same_ day (I doubt you are doing that, though), because
> we can debug effectively focusing on fewer problems. For example,
> 1. hvm, 2. sanity testing (a day or two), 3. 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-rcX
> This way we can get more hvm people focusing on 2.6.15 or 2.6.16-rcX.

Makes sense.

> Having the best possible vendor releases will definitely make our life
> easier. I think we should go with 2.6.16-rc1. 

To nobody's surprise, I like this as well.

> > Any reason not to call 3.0.1 now? There are a load of bug fixes and
> > improvements over 3.0.0.
> > 
> I think it's a good idea to release 3.0.1 at this point. 

And so do I.

Kurt Garloff, Head Architect, Director SUSE Labs (act.), Novell Inc.

Attachment: pgppAUIvWjkMu.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Xen-devel mailing list