[Xen-devel] Re: VMX status report Nov.18 changset 7870

To:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: VMX status report Nov.18 changset 7870
From:	Antti Louko <alo@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:13:18 +0200
Cc:	kuiliang.shi@xxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Fri, 18 Nov 2005 15:53:43 +0000
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<opu0ea85qo.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<opu0ea85qo.wl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.4 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

One further question.  I just wonder if 662 and 672 are really
different to 660 and 670 or is this just the matter of microcode
update or some other magic?  This would explain the need for the
special BIOS.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: VMX status report Nov.18 changset 7870