WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-api

Re: [Xen-API] RFC: Shuffling xen-api-libs

To: Vincent Hanquez <Vincent.Hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-API] RFC: Shuffling xen-api-libs
From: Jonathan Ludlam <Jonathan.Ludlam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 08:38:21 +0100
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:38:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4EAA31C4.5020509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of API issues surrounding Xen <xen-api.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-api@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api>, <mailto:xen-api-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C1AE0619-A994-487F-8D21-C9660F9E408E@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EAA31C4.5020509@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-api-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcyVRJJEEBphh3itSjSwURW24OMjBw==
Thread-topic: [Xen-API] RFC: Shuffling xen-api-libs
There's not much point in, e.g. the cpuid module being it's own findlib 
package. For some of the larger ones, there's a more reasonable argument (e.g. 
log). That's the whole point. Which modules do you feel should have their own 
findlib package?

Jon


On 28 Oct 2011, at 05:38, Vincent Hanquez wrote:

> On 10/27/2011 11:43 PM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> In order to get xen-api-libs into Debian, it's got to be in a reasonable 
>> state. I believe we're quite a long way off reasonable at the moment, so I'd 
>> just like to send out a Plan of Action to define how we're going to get from 
>> where we are to where we need to be.
> 
>> So, is this a crazy plan? Does anyone agree/disagree/have an opinion?
> 
> I think, that's sad that it's going in the wrong direction. module should 
> have a 
> chance to become useful in their own right, not be stuffed in a xapi-only 
> munbo 
> jumbo of modules. This nullify the splitting work too and somewhat goes 
> against 
> the debian way of packaging.
> 
> -- 
> Vincent
> 
> _______________________________________________
> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api


_______________________________________________
xen-api mailing list
xen-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-api