On Monday 14 February 2011 09:41 PM, Jonathan Ludlam wrote:
> Hi all,
> OK, the saga of the XCP-1.0 release continues...!
> Code-wise, things are pretty much fixed at this point. We don't expect to be
> doing much more unless anyone points out some real showstoppers. Many things
> have been fixed since the beta came out, including the issue with VDIs being
> locked when a host is hard-powered off, and a nasty kernel oops when using
> the md driver.
Nice to read that the VDI error wont be coming :)
I had to roll back to XCP0.5 as I was facing the VDI error many times on
the XCP1.0 beta. The storage was a shared NFS which got stuck sometimes
resulting VM hangups.
But since I am using XCP1 beta on a shared iSCSI storage, things are
Thanks for this wonderful product :)
> What's currently blocking the 1.0 release is that we're working hard on
> getting the documentation/wiki sorted out, which has long needed an overhaul.
> We're currently thinking that, if everything works out fine, the 23-34th is
> the expected date for the release.
> There is an rc2 available here:
> (build number 40948)
> Don't ask about rc1 :-)
> If anyone wants to install the rc2 and give its tyres a kick, I'd be very
> grateful, particularly if you found any nasty surprises.
> Thanks all for your patience,
> On 11 Feb 2011, at 08:08, Christian Fischer wrote:
>> On Friday 11 February 2011 08:54:05 Vincent Hanquez wrote:
>>> On 11/02/11 07:10, Christian Fischer wrote:
>>>> On Thursday 10 February 2011 19:58:26 Lars Kurth wrote:
>>>>> I can't answer the question on the painless upgrade path, but we are
>>>>> aiming for a release date in about two weeks.
>>>> Two weeks? Week two of february is this week. Is this a typo?
>>> There's nothing that says two weeks in the february month.
>>> it probably means 2 weeks from when the mail has been sent...
>> Well, Mike has announced the release for the second week of february in the
>> first mail of this thread ten days ago. Of course, Lars means two weeks from
>> when the mail has been sent.
>> Is there a pre release younger than build 38754?
>> xen-api mailing list
> xen-api mailing list
xen-api mailing list