This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] New to Xen, looking for advice regarding system configur

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Braindead <Braindead@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You haven't said why you want to move away from vmware. If we know
>> what your priorities are, we might be able to give better advice. For
>> example, if you're used to vmware-style GUI, but want an open-source
>> license, XCP might be a better choice. But it you want something you
>> can tinker, or use bleeding-edge technology, then starting with a
>> distro that includes Xen would be a better choice.
> I use VMWare workstation at work

Ah, that might explain it. Did you know that Vmware has vsphere
hypervisor (ESXi)? :D

>, I use virtualbox on Linux a bit.  I only mention VMWare to note that I'm 
>used to the concepts of VM's.  I prefer running *nix, Gentoo to be precise.
> My home server is running a ton of services (subversion, mail, http, backup, 
> router, ossec, nagios, dns, dhcp..etc) and for sanity's sake I'd like to 
> break that up into multiple servers.  I also need a few windows boxes 
> (various configs, versions).
> Goal is to consolidate things into one box, and have a complete backup box as 
> well.  Thus virtualization.  The XEN 'near bare metal' performance is what 
> I'm interested in, and definitely into optimizing every aspect I can which is 
> why I use a source distro.

We actually did some internal benchmark before deploying some servers
with virtualization (mainly for database). The benchmark was using fio
(mainly for randomrw) and sysbench. In short, performance-wise, RHEL5
+ kernel-xen in xen setup has almost the same performance with RHEL5
(native kernel) in ESXi. Since these servers will be managed by people
which are not-so-comfortable using command line tools, and we don't
need more than 4 core per virtual server, we ended up going with ESXi.

YMMV, so if you're interested in choices better run your own tests.

>> IIRC the main selling point of server-grade motherborad used to be the
>> ability to use ECC RAM. But now some motherboards for i7 support ECC
>> RAM and SATA III.
> Many include system monitoring and alerting capabilities in the BIOS (or at 
> least used to, it's been a while since I've worked on server grade hardware).

ah, yes, I forgot about ILOs and such :)
>From my experience though, remote console and remote reboot are the
features mostly used (which, to some extent, can be replaced with KVM
over IP). Alerting capabilites, not so much.

>> Another option would be using SSD as cache, with something like
>> facebook's flashcache. This setup would reduce the possibility of data
>> loss (since SSD will only be cache), and have the additional benefit
>> of higher capacity (compared to pure SSD setup), but is also more
>> complex and (depending on how you look at it) "experimental".
> Isn't that what the 'hybrid' drives are?

Kinda. flashcache lets you mix any kind of SSD of any size with any
kind of HDD, so you have greater control.

> I'd think those would work outta the box, should look just like a regular 
> drive to the OS I'd think?

They should. If you've got one of them I recommend try it out.
flashcache benchmark [1] seems very good, so if the hybrid drives can
come close to that within a reasonable price tag they'd be a hit.



Xen-users mailing list