WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] AoE vs iSCSI

Hello,

Am 18.03.2010 um 17:29 Uhr schrieb Jeff Sturm <jeff.sturm@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Markus Hochholdinger [mailto:Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 10:17 AM
> > To: Jeff Sturm
> > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] AoE vs iSCSI
[..]
> Unfortunately vblade is little more than a toy program.  Its beauty lies
> in its simplicity.  Its drawbacks lie also in its simplicity.  It's nice
> to have as a reference program for those who want to tinker with the
> protocol or understand how AoE works, but you can't really draw any
> conclusions about performance of the AoE protocol from using vblade in
> general.

well, vblade was the server part and on my AoE client i only run the aoe 
module, so i thought it would make no difference what "server" part i use 
because i testet on the client side. The hardware had no problem servicing 
with vblade. The problem was on the client side! My assumption was that also 
a coraid product as server wouldn't do because the problem was on the client 
side. But perhaps i'm wrong.


[..]
> You should have better overall results testing with another open source
> implementation like qaoed, or using Coraid's commercial product.  I have
> routinely demonstrated 200MB/s throughput performing sequential
> transfers on an AoE target, multipathing over 2 GigE adapters.

At this time qaoed wasn't an option, i tried it but it was worse than vblade!


> There's nothing wrong with iSCSI either, and many users have perfectly
> valid reasons to require iSCSI.  But you can get comparable performance
> with AoE for Linux hosts, often spending far less.

OK, i don't doubt that, but i would test it myself :-D

For now, i don't have the need to test again because i'm very fine with iSCSI. 
Also a lot of people are fine with AoE.


> This is getting a bit off-topic for a Xen list, I'm afraid.

Especially the point that more than one AoE block devices had a bad impact on 
performance for me i advice other people who need more than one AoE block 
devices to test the performance. Hopefully this isn't the case anymore.
For a Xen setup where you have one block device per domU it is very important 
to know how much block devices you can manage - so for me this isn't really 
offtopic.


-- 
greetings

eMHa

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>