|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Grant McWilliams
<grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> CentOS 5.4? If my time machine worked :-) . I'm already running CentOS 5.3
> with Gitco's Xen 3.4.1.
>
> Here's another system: CentOS 5.3 Dom0, CentOS 5.3 DomUs on a Dual Core Duo
> Xeon system (2.8ghz)
>
> DomU to DomU - 1.93 Gbits/sec
> DomU to Dom0 - 2.76 Gbit/sec
> Dom0 to DomU - 193 Mbits/sec
Ah ... so domU <-> domU is working FINE, right? That is similar with
the results I get :D
As for dom0 -> domU performance, it is indeed lower, and I'm not sure
why. In my case it's still usable though (about 600-800 Mbps), since I
don't run any service on dom0 that is used by domU. Here's my dom0 <->
domU result.
# iperf -c 192.168.122.1 -r
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.122.1, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.122.49 port 52890 connected with 192.168.122.1 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 2.72 GBytes 2.34 Gbits/sec
[ 4] local 192.168.122.49 port 5001 connected with 192.168.122.1 port 16809
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 747 MBytes 627 Mbits/sec
192.168.122.1 -> dom0's virbr0, running RHEL5.4 64bit,
kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5, Xen 3.4.1.
192.168.122.49 -> domU, kernel-xen-2.6.18-164.2.1.el5
I'm not sure why your dom0 -> domU is about 3 times slower than mine.
Perhaps newer kernel version matters.
--
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] Xen Performance, LoD MoD
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Igor S. Pelykh
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Brian Krusic
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance,
Fajar A. Nugraha <=
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fasiha Ashraf
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Fajar A. Nugraha
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Pasi Kärkkäinen
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Grant McWilliams
- RE: [Xen-users] Xen Performance, Dustin Henning
|
|
|
|
|