This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in har

To: Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in hard disc reading
From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 08:03:38 +0700
Delivery-date: Sat, 30 May 2009 18:05:03 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A216ACE.8070108@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <51147.49632.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0905241536h5d1e9063ke6737b0dc2a4c2e4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4A216ACE.8070108@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Heli <helicoterus-elih@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> How is it possible that a PV domU returns 180 MB/sec if on a normal linux
> hdparm returns 45 MB/sec?

Did you read my first email?
"first of all, make sure you do NOT use file:/ in domU config."

I wrote that for a reason, you know. :)
Short story, dom0 caching effect can skew performance benchmark results.


Xen-users mailing list