| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-users] Re: Xen is a feature
|
To: |
jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-users] Re: Xen is a feature |
|
From: |
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2009 23:51:10 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Cc: |
npiggin@xxxxxxx, ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxx, stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx, George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 29 May 2009 08:50:05 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<1243579052.3159.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<4A1F302E.8030501@xxxxxxxx> <20090528.210559.137121893.davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1243579052.3159.32.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:32 +0530
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:05 -0700, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:45:34 -0700
>>
>> > Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> >> Xen changes - especially dom0 - are overwhelmingly not about improving
>> >> Linux, but about having some special hook and extra treatment in
>> >> random places - and that's really bad.
>> >>
>> >
>> > You've made this argument a few times now, and I take exception to it.
>> >
>> > It seems to be predicated on the idea that Xen has some kind of niche
>> > usage, with barely more users than Voyager. Or that it is a parasite
>> > sitting on the side of Linux, being a pure drain.
>>
>> I don't see Ingo's comments, whether I agree with them or not, as
>> an implication of Xen being niche. Rather I see his comments as
>> an opposition to how Xen is implemented.
>>
>
> You can see Ingo's comments and whole thread under subject :
>
> Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops)
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/27/758
Jeremy is specifically commenting on Ingo's quoted "argument".
And that "argument" is what he takes "exception to".
And that's the scope of what I'm commenting on too.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home