| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen is a feature
|
To: |
jeremy@xxxxxxxx |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen is a feature |
|
From: |
David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Thu, 28 May 2009 21:05:59 -0700 (PDT) |
|
Cc: |
npiggin@xxxxxxx, ksrinivasan@xxxxxxxxxx, dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, wimcoekaerts@xxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxx, stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx, George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, avi@xxxxxxxxxx, EAnderson@xxxxxxxxxx, jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx, mingo@xxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxx, keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 29 May 2009 08:45:22 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4A1F302E.8030501@xxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<162f4c90-6431-4a2a-b337-6d7451d7b11e@default> <20090528001350.GD26820@xxxxxxx> <4A1F302E.8030501@xxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:45:34 -0700
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> Xen changes - especially dom0 - are overwhelmingly not about improving
>> Linux, but about having some special hook and extra treatment in
>> random places - and that's really bad.
>>
>
> You've made this argument a few times now, and I take exception to it.
>
> It seems to be predicated on the idea that Xen has some kind of niche
> usage, with barely more users than Voyager. Or that it is a parasite
> sitting on the side of Linux, being a pure drain.
I don't see Ingo's comments, whether I agree with them or not, as
an implication of Xen being niche. Rather I see his comments as
an opposition to how Xen is implemented.
> We're taking your technical critiques very seriously, of course, and I
> appreciate any constructive comment. But your baseline position of
> animosity towards Xen is unreasonable, unfair and unnecessary.
I don't see any animosity at all in what Ingo has said.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home