This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-users] Bridges are not working

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Bridges are not working
From: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda <leo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:08:27 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 May 2009 03:09:16 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7207d96f0905260134l78cf4bdlb0b6d8b30bcf174b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200905261016.54814.leo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <7207d96f0905260134l78cf4bdlb0b6d8b30bcf174b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.9.9
A Dimarts 26 Maig 2009, Fajar A. Nugraha va escriure:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
> <leo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The bridge and physical interface MUST be up. On your case, the bridge
> >> is eth1 and the physical device is peth1. It does NOT need to have an
> >> IP address though.
> >>
> >> If I'm not mistaken earlier versions of Xen uses xenbr0/xenbr1 as
> >> bridge name, so that might be the change you get.
> >
> > well, I have not be able (or i don't know how ...) to have an interface
> > up without an ip ... in the last version of xen, my interfaces file had
> > no entry for eth1 (peth1).
> Perhaps something like this will work
> auto eth1
> iface eth1 inet manual

nops, It didn't work ... I simply put a private IP, but it should work without 
a IP.

> > Yes, this is also I changethat I don't understand.
> Xen's default bridging has changed several times, and it has caused
> some problems for me in the past as well. Plus I needed to use vlans
> (have a bridge for each vlan). So I disabled xend's network scripts
> (on xend-config.sxp) and setup vlans and bridges manually from the OS.
> I'm using RHEL5.3 btw, which is stable so far, and I can complain to
> RH's support (although there was never a need to) if I get problems.




Xen-users mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>